Brief Fact Summary
Defendant had forced sexual intercourse with his wife while they were separated and after the wife had obtained a protection order from the court that required the defendant to move out of and remain away from the family home. The defendant raised the marital exception as a defense for rape.
Rule of Law and Holding
The court held that the marital exception did not apply because the defendant was under a court order to stay away from the plaintiff and the family home. Further, the court abolished the marital exception to rape.