Conley v. Pitney Bowes
United States Court of Appeals, Eigth Circuit, 1994
34 F.3d 714
| Audio Opinion | Coming Soon | |
| Audio Case Brief | Purchase Subscription |
Brief Fact Summary
Conley initiated action against his employer, Pitney Bowes, after he had been denied continued disability benefits for a claim arising from injuries suffered in an automobile accident. At issue was whether a claimant must exhaust administrative procedures when, contrary to the requirements of his plan, the letter denying his benefits does not inform him of appeal procedures.
Rule of Law and Holding
"[I]n bilateral contracts for an agreed exchange of performances, . . . where one party's performance is to be rendered prior in time to that of the other, it is a constructive condition precedent to the latter's duty."
Topics
Contract Duties
Subtopics
The Order of Performance
This case is in these books
-
Contracts
-
Dawson, Henderson, Harvey
-
7th Edition
Coming Soon
Click here if you would like to receive an email when this case becomes available.
- Contracts
- Dawson, Henderson, Harvey
- 7th Edition
Coming Soon
Click here if you would like to receive an email when this case becomes available.
